Friday, 2 October 2026

Gaurav Jain Vs. Sanjay Gupta - Sale of CD as a Going Concern during Liquidation Process.

  NCLT Mumbai-I (09.03.2021) in Gaurav Jain  Vs. Sanjay Gupta, [IA No. 2264 of 2020 in C.P. (IB) No. 1239/MB/2018] held that;

  • The crux of the ‘going concern sale’ is that the equity shareholding of the Corporate Debtor is extinguished and the acquirer takes over the undertaking with the assets, licenses, entitlements etc.

  • The Corporate Debtor survives, only the ownership is transferred by the Liquidator to the purchaser. All the rights, titles and interest in the Corporate Debtor including the legal entity is transferred to the purchaser. After the sale as a ‘going concern’, the purchaser will be carrying on the business of the Corporate Debtor.

  • As far as the Liquidator is concerned, when the sale consideration is received from the bidder / purchaser, the same will be distributed to the Creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the Code. Since the amount is paid to the Creditors in terms of the Code, the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor towards the Creditors are treated as settled and the purchaser takes the assets free of any encumbrances or whatsoever.

  • In the normal parlance “going concern” sale is transfer of assets along with the liabilities. However, as far as the ‘going concern’ sale in liquidation is concerned, there is a clear difference that only assets are transferred and the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor has to be settled in accordance with Section 53 of the Code and hence the purchaser of this assets takes over the assets without any encumbrance or charge and free from the action of the Creditors.


Excerpts of the order;

# 1. The Applicant herein is the successful bidder in the E-auction for the Sale of the assets of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern and the Respondent herein is the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor.


# 2. On a Petition under Section 7 filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the Code) by Bank of Baroda, the Corporate Debtor viz. Topworth Pipes & Tubes Private Limited was put under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by an order dated 11/12/2018 of this Bench.


# 3. In the absence of a Resolution Plan, this Bench on 12/06/2020 passed an order for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 33 of the Code.


# 4. The Liquidator invited bids for the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a ‘going concern’ by an E-auction process memorandum dated 13/10/2020. The Liquidator published first addendum to

the E-auction process memorandum on 29/10/2020 and second addendum on 03/11/2020.


# 5. The E-auction process memorandum states that the sale of the Company is on ‘going concern’ basis in accordance with the provisions of the Code, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (Liquidation Process Regulations) and the E-auction process information document. It further states that the sale of the Company is proposed to be done on “as is where is basis”, “as is what is basis”, “whatever there is basis” and “no recourse basis” and the proposed sale of the Company on going concern basis does not entail transfer of any other title, except the title which the Company had on its assets as on the date of transfer. The Liquidator does not take or assume any responsibility for any shortfall, defect or shortcoming in the moveable / immoveable assets of the Company. The Reserve Price fixed was Rs. 152 Crores.


# 8. The Liquidator issued an Addendum dated 29/10/2020 to the E Auction process document wherein the key timelines were mentioned. The Liquidator issued another Addendum dated 03/11/2020 to the main E-auction process document wherein the key highlights of the asset sale process mentioned in the E Auction process document dated 13/10/2020 is replaced  . . .  .

  • The Company proposed to be sold on a “going concern” basis, as per the order of the Adjudicating Authority on June, 12th 2020. Accordingly, Corporate Debtor along with the business, assets and liabilities, including all contracts, licenses, concessions, agreements, benefits, privileges, rights or interests be transferred to the acquirer. Post the transfer, the Successful Bidder shall be entitled to transfer/apply for transfer of all the licenses, approvals, concessions, and benefits as may be applicable to the unit.


# 11. The Applicant participated in the E-auction process held on 11/11/2020 and submitted bid for Rs. 190.90 Crores to acquire the Corporate Debtor as a ‘going concern’. The Applicant being the H1 Bidder, Liquidator confirmed the Applicant’s bid and issued letter of intent (LoI) to the Applicant on 12/11/2020.


# 12. On 18/11/2020 the Applicant deposited a sum of Rs.32,52,50,000/-. This amount along with the EMD worked out to a total of Rs. 47,72,50,000/- which is 25% of the sale consideration of Rs. 190.90 Crores.


# 14. The Applicant submits that the mere purchase of the Corporate Debtor as a ‘going concern’ as per Liquidation Process Regulations will not suffice. In order to ensure smooth running of the business of the Corporate Debtor, it is imperative that certain additional reliefs / concessions / relaxations / and permissions are allowed which would be essential and necessary to run the business of the Corporate Debtor as a ‘going concern’. Unless these reliefs / concessions / permissions are provided, the purpose of the revival of the Corporate Debtor as a ‘going concern’ under Liquidation Process Regulations will not be achieved. In fact, these permissions / relaxation / concessions / reliefs are crucial to kickstart the business of the Corporate Debtor and achieve value maximization of the Corporate Debtor.


# 15. The Applicant further submits that this Tribunal is empowered  to grant necessary reliefs in relation to the Corporate Debtor, sold as a ‘going concern’ under the provisions of the Liquidation Process Regulations, under Section 60(5)(c) of the Code. Therefore, the Applicant submits that the instant case is a fit case to grant the reliefs in favour of the Applicant.


# 16. In the above background this Applicant preferred Application with the following reliefs:

  • (a) the Applicant along with the entities as mentioned in Paragraph 2 above may be permitted to pay/adjust the Sale Consideration in the following manner (i) INR 40,00,00,000/- (Indian Rupees Forty Crores only) by way of investment into the equity shares of the Corporate Debtor; and (ii) the balance amount of INR 150,90,00,000/- (Indian Rupees One Hundred and Fifty Crores and Ninety Lakhs only) in the form of unsecured debt;

  • (b) a direction be issued that immediately upon payment of the entire Sale Consideration, the Applicant (or the entities as mentioned in Paragraph 2 above, as the case may be) get all the rights, title and interest in the whole and every part of the Corporate Debtor, including but not limited to contracts, free from security interest, encumbrance, claim, counter claim or any demur, and the Sale Consideration shall be distributed by the Liquidator in terms of the Section 53 of the Code;

  • (c) a direction be issued that on and from the Date of Acquisition, all the claims or demands made by, or liabilities or obligations owned or payable to any actual or potential creditors of the Corporate Debtor including the Government Dues (including but not limited to liabilities, interest and penalties, duties, etc. on account of income-tax, tax deduction at source, tax collection at source, goods and services tax, custom duty, value added tax, service tax, wealth-tax, cess, DGFT dues, etc.) whether direct or indirect, whether admitted or not, due or contingent, asserted or unasserted, crystallized or uncrystallized, known or unknown, secured or unsecured, disputed or undisputed in relation to any period prior to the Date of Acquisition will be written off in full and shall stand permanently extinguished;

  • (d) a direction be issued that the all inquiries, investigations, assessments, notices, causes of action, suits, claims, disputes, litigations, arbitration, or other judicial, regulatory or administrative proceedings against, or in relation to, or in connection with the Corporate Debtor or the affairs of the Corporate Debtor (other than against the Erstwhile Promoters or former members of the management of the Corporate Debtor), pending or threatened, present or future, in relation to any period prior to the Date of Acquisition or arising on account of the Acquisition shall be deemed to be withdrawn or dismissed; 

  • (e) a direction be issued that all financial and pecuniary liabilities of the Corporate Debtor, (including without limitation, any penalty, whether contingent, assessed, known or unknown, interest, fines or fees and any other liabilities and/or obligations which may have a financial impact) in relation to any period prior to the Date of Acquisition shall be deemed to be extinguished; 

  • (f) a direction be issued that any non-compliance of provisions of any laws, rules, regulations, directions, notifications, circulars, guidelines, policies, licenses, approvals, consents or permissions prior to the Date of Acquisition shall be deemed to be extinguished;

  • (g) a direction be issued that all the existing shares of the Corporate Debtor shall be extinguished without any consideration, and rights and liabilities arising out of the same shall also be extinguished;

  • (h) a direction be issued that on and from the Date of Acquisition, the status of the Corporate Debtor in the records of the Registrar of Companies should be reflected as 'active' from the status of 'liquidation'

  • (i) a direction be issued that from the Date of Acquisition, the Board of Directors of the Corporate Debtor be reconstituted as per the Companies Act, 2013 and that the following individuals be permitted to act as Directors of the Corporate Debtor duly appointed under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and direct the Registrar of Companies to do all such acts, deeds and things that are necessary to appoint the following individuals as directors of the Corporate Debtor, who are individuals recommended by the Applicant, in order to enable the Corporate Debtor to file relevant returns required by applicable law:

  • (j) a direction be issued that all subsisting consents, licenses, approvals, rights, entitlements, benefits and privileges whether under law, contract, lease or license, granted in favour of the Corporate Debtor or to which the Corporate Debtor is entitled to shall, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in their terms and irrespective of the commencement of the insolvency/liquidation proceedings under the Code, in relation to the Corporate Debtor be deemed to continue without disruption, for the benefit of the Corporate Debtor and all additional licenses, registrations and consents required by the Corporate Debtor be made available immediately from the Date of the Acquisition;

  • (k) a direction be issued that the Corporate Debtor shall have a right to review and terminate any contract that was entered into prior to the date of the Liquidation Order;

  • (l) a direction be issued that on and from the Date of Acquisition, all the assets specified in the complete EAuction Memorandums shall continue to be the assets of the Corporate Debtor, towards which the Applicant has made payment by way of the Sale Consideration; 

  • (m) a direction be issued to the Liquidator to cooperate with, and provide all necessary support and assistance to the Applicant, including but not limited to perfecting / amending / modifying / creating the land records in relation to all parcels of land, the immovable properties and assets, belonging to the Corporate Debtor in favour of the Corporate Debtor within 15 days from Date of Acquisition;

  • (n) a direction be issued to the Liquidator to, immediately,

  • - (i) write back all the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor, including creditors, term loans, working capital loans, tax liabilities, other statutory liabilities, etc. which are not payable and reflect the total liabilities at the amount of the consideration (as reduced by the amount of insolvency resolution process costs and the liquidation costs) determined in the auction; and 

  • - (ii) the assets which are not recoverable (debtors, inventories and loans and advances, etc.) should be written down to their realizable value; in the financial statements (Profit and Loss Account and the Balance Sheet) of the Corporate Debtor as on 31st March 2020. The said financial statements should be prepared and filed by the Liquidator with the relevant regulators such as Registrar of Companies, Income Tax Authorities,etc.;

  • (o) a direction be issued to the Liquidator that all the compliances for the period up to the Date of Acquisition including filing of necessary documents and returns with the Registrar of Companies, Income Tax Authorities any other Government Authorities should be completed;

  • (p) a direction be issued that the brought forward tax losses of the Corporate Debtor be permitted to be carried forward and set-off against future income as change of shareholding of the Corporate Debtor is pursuant to the bid submitted by the Applicant under the E-Auction Process;

  • (q) a direction be issued that the eligibility of the Corporate Debtor to claim incentives under the Package Incentive Scheme, as framed by the Government of Maharashtra, shall be extended for a period of 5 (five) years from the Date of Acquisition;

  • (r) the bid submitted by the Applicant should be considered to be a resolution plan under Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961;

  • (s) Other or further order or orders be passed and/or direction or directions be given as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.


# 17. The Respondent / Liquidator in his reply stated that the Prayer in Clause (a) is in consonance with the letter and spirit of the Eauction Memorandum and he has no objection to the said prayer.


# 19. The Respondent further submits that in respect of the prayers (m), (n) & (o) he does not have any objections.


# 20. Regulation 32 of the Liquidation Process Regulations provides for the realisation of assets and the same is extracted below: 

Sale of Assets, etc.The Liquidator may sell 

  • a) an asset on a standalone basis;

  • b) the assets in a slump sale;

  • c) a set of assets collectively;

  • d) the assets in parcels;

  • e) the corporate debtor as a going concern; or

  • f) the business(s) of the corporate debtor as a going concern:

Provided that where an asset is subject to security interest, it shall not be sold under any of the clauses (a) to (f) unless the security interest therein has been relinquished to the liquidation estate.]”


# 24. One advantage of the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a ‘going concern’ is that the Corporate Debtor is retained, it will not be dissolved and the Corporate Debtor will be transferred along with the assets. So, the Corporate Debtor as a legal entity remains as such.


# 25. The crux of the ‘going concern sale’ is that the equity shareholding of the Corporate Debtor is extinguished and the acquirer takes over the undertaking with the assets, licenses, entitlements etc. The undertaking includes the business of the Corporate Debtor, assets, properties and rights etc. excluding the liabilities. However, in this case the assets that are included in the E-Auction Memorandum only have to be taken over by the Applicant.


# 26. The Corporate Debtor survives, only the ownership is transferred by the Liquidator to the purchaser. All the rights, titles and interest in the Corporate Debtor including the legal entity is transferred to the purchaser. After the sale as a ‘going concern’, the purchaser will be carrying on the business of the Corporate Debtor.


# 27. As far as the Liquidator is concerned, when the sale consideration is received from the bidder / purchaser, the same will be distributed to the Creditors in accordance with Section 53 of the Code. Since the amount is paid to the Creditors in terms of the Code, the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor towards the Creditors are treated as settled and the purchaser takes the assets free of any encumbrances or whatsoever.


# 28. In the normal parlance “going concern” sale is transfer of assets along with the liabilities. However, as far as the ‘going concern’ sale in liquidation is concerned, there is a clear difference that only assets are transferred and the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor has to be settled in accordance with Section 53 of the Code and hence the purchaser of this assets takes over the assets without any encumbrance or charge and free from the action of the Creditors.


29. This Bench feels that following are the advantages of selling the Corporate Debtor “as a going concern”: 

  • a. The entity i.e., the Corporate Debtor itself gets transferred;

  • b. The equity shareholding gets transferred or extinguished and new shares are issued;

  • c. The purchaser is expected to carry on the business of the Corporate Debtor after the sale of assets is confirmed;

  • d. The existing employees will have a chance to continue in their employment.


# 31. In the case of sale as a ‘going concern’ the Corporate Debtor will not be dissolved in terms of Section 54 of the Code. The assets with the attendant, claims, limitations, licenses, permits or business authorisations, remains in the Company. Only the ownership of the Company is acquired by the successful bidder from the Liquidator.


# 32. It is to be noted that even though there is no specific provision in the Code regarding “sale of the Company as a going concern”, IBBI has formed the Liquidation Process Regulations, under the Code and we have to take them as guiding principles in dealing with the case.


# 34. As a consequence to the above discussions and on perusal of the pleadings and submissions made by the learned senior counsel for the Applicant the following order is passed:

  • (a) Prayer (a) is allowed. The Applicant is permitted to bring in Rs. 40 crores as share capital and Rs. 150.90 crores as unsecured debt towards payment of sale consideration.

  • (b) The Applicant shall get all the rights, title and interest over whole and every part of the Corporate Debtor, including but not limited to contracts free from security interest, encumbrance, claim, counter claim or any demur. The sale consideration, when received, shall be distributed by the Liquidator in terms of the Section 53 of the Code. Prayer (b) is accordingly allowed.

  • (c) The Applicant shall not be responsible for any other claims / liabilities / obligations etc. payable by the Corporate Debtor as on this date to the Creditors or any other stakeholders including Government dues. All the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor as on date stand extinguished, as far as the Applicant is concerned.

  • (d) Any proceedings pending against the Corporate Debtor (other than against the Erstwhile Promoters or former members of the management of the Corporate Debtor) as on date with respect to its liabilities, enquiries, investigations, assessments, claims, disputes, litigations etc. will not have any bearing against the assets sold in this process. The said assets are free from any financial implications arising out of any pending proceedings before relevant authorities, if any.

  • (e) The existing shares / share capital of the Corporate Debtor shall stand cancelled without there being any payment to the Shareholders. The Liquidator in consultation with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) concerned shall take action to change the status of the Corporate Debtor in the records of the RoC from the status of “liquidation” to the status of “active”. The concerned RoC shall do the needful.

  • (f) The Board of the Corporate Debtor can be reconstituted as indicated in prayer (i) and necessary filings may be made to the RoC concerned.

  • (g) Prayer (j) is allowed subject to payment of renewal fees, if any, from this date to the licensing authorities.

  • (h) The Applicant / Corporate Debtor shall have the right to review and terminate any contract that was entered into prior to the date of this order. The assets specified in the E-auction memorandum, on payment of the consideration as above will vest with the Applicant. Accordingly, prayers (m), (n) & (o) are allowed.

  • (i) The Applicant shall not be held responsible / liable for any of the past liabilities of the Corporate Debtor in inquiries, investigations, assessments, notices, causes of action, suits, claims, disputes, litigations, arbitration or other judicial, regulatory or administrative proceedings against or in relation to, or in connection with the Corporate Debtor prior to this date. They shall not have any effect on the Applicant.

  • (j) The Applicant is entitled to get all the rights, title and interest whole and every part of the Corporate Debtor.

  • (k) Creditors of the Corporate Debtor which include Creditors in any form or category including Government Departments shall stand extinguished qua the Applicant.

  • (l) The non-compliance of provisions of any laws, rules, regulations, directions, notifications, circulars, guidelines, policies, licenses, approvals, consents or permissions prior to the date of acquisition shall stand extinguished qua the Applicant.

  • (m) All the assets specified in the E-auction memorandum shall continue to be the assets of the Corporate Debtor on making the payment of the balance sale consideration to the Liquidator by the Applicant.

  • (n) The Liquidator is directed to provide all support and assistant to the Applicant for the smooth functioning of the Corporate Debtor to complete the acquisition.

  • (o) The Liquidator and Applicant shall be at liberty to take all the steps required to make accounting entries for the smooth transmission and clearing the balance sheet.

  • (p) The Liquidator is directed to ensure completion of pending filings with the Registrar of Companies, Income Tax Authorities and any other Government /Statutory Authorities.

  • (q) The Corporate Debtor is entitled to get the benefits of brought forward losses, if any, subject to permission of the appropriate authority if so entitled under the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

  • (r) The Corporate Debtor may apply for incentives under the Package Incentive Scheme, framed by the Government of Maharashtra, subject to eligibility and other norms as provided in the said Scheme. 

  • (s) As far as the prayer for considering the bid submitted by the Applicant as Resolution Plan under Section 79 of Income Tax Act, 1961 is concerned, the Applicant may approach the authority concerned who would consider such request under the Income Tax Act.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Blogger’s comments; Following observations of AA in the order are quite significant;


# 31. In the case of sale as a ‘going concern’ the Corporate Debtor will not be dissolved in terms of Section 54 of the Code. The assets with the attendant, claims, limitations, licenses, permits or business authorisations, remains in the Company. Only the ownership of the Company is acquired by the successful bidder from the Liquidator.


# 32. It is to be noted that even though there is no specific provision in the Code regarding “sale of the Company as a going concern”, IBBI has formed the Liquidation Process Regulations, under the Code and we have to take them as guiding principles in dealing with the case.


The question arises whether the provisions of “Subordinate Legislation” (Liquidation Regulations) can override the provisions of the “Principal Legislation”, (Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016)  specifically when concerned provision of the “Principal Legislation” (Section 54) does not mandate Board for “Subordinate Legislation”.

  • Section 54. Dissolution of corporate debtor. -

  • (1) Where the assets of the corporate debtor have been completely liquidated, the liquidator shall make an application to the Adjudicating Authority for the dissolution of such corporate debtor.

  • (2) The Adjudicating Authority shall on application filed by the liquidator under sub-section (1) order that the corporate debtor shall be dissolved from the date of that order and the corporate debtor shall be dissolved accordingly.

  • (3) A copy of an order under sub-section (2) shall within seven days from the date of such order, be forwarded to the authority with which the corporate debtor is registered.


Thus, as per section 54, the liquidation process attains finality or say gets completed, with the dissolution of the CD.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transfer of Property Act. # 55. Rights and liabilities of buyer and seller.

 Transfer of Property Act.

# 55. Rights and liabilities of buyer and seller.—In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the buyer and the seller of immoveable property respectively are subject to the liabilities, and have the rights, mentioned in the rules next following, or such of them as are applicable to the property sold:

(1) The seller is bound—

  • (a) to disclose to the buyer any material defect in the property or in the seller’s title thereto of which the seller is, and the buyer is not, aware, and which the buyer could not with ordinary care discover;

  • (b) to produce to the buyer on his request for examination all documents of title relating to the property which are in the seller's possession or power;

  • (c) to answer to the best of his information all relevant questions put to him by the buyer in respect to the property or the title thereto;

  • (d) on payment or tender of the amount due in respect of the price, to execute a proper conveyance of the property when the buyer tenders it to him for execution at a proper time and place;

  • (e) between the date of the contract of sale and the delivery of the property, to take as much care of the property and all documents of title relating thereto which are in his possession, as an owner of ordinary prudence would take of such property and documents;

  • (f) to give, on being so required, the buyer, or such person as he directs, such possession of the property as its nature admits;

  • (g) to pay all public charges and rent accrued due in respect of the property up to the date of the sale, the interest on all incumbrances on such property due on such date, and, except where the property is sold subject to incumbrances, to discharge all incumbrances on the property then existing.


(2) The seller shall be deemed to contract with the buyer that the interest which the seller professes to transfer to the buyer subsists and that he has power to transfer the same. Provided that, where the sale is made by a person ina fiduciary character, he shall be deemed to contract with the buyer that the seller has done no act whereby the property is incumbered or whereby he is hindered from transferring it.


The benefit of the contract mentioned in this rule shall be annexed to, and shall go with, the interest of the transferee as such, and may be enforced by every person in whom that interest is for the whole or any part thereof from time to time vested.


(3) Where the whole of the purchase-money has been paid to the seller, he is also bound to

deliver to the buyer all documents of title relating to the property which are in the seller’s possession or power:

Provided that, (a) where the seller retains any part of the property comprised in such documents, he is entitled to retain them all, and, (b) where the whole of such property is sold to different buyers the buyers, of the lot of greatest value is entitled to such documents. But in case (a) the seller, and in case (b) the buyer of the lot of greatest value, is bound, upon every reasonable request by the buyer, or by any of the other buyers, as the case may be, and at the cost of the person making the request, to produce the said documents and furnish such truecopies thereof or extracts therefrom as he may require; and in the meantime, the seller, or the buyer, of the lot of greatest value, as the case may be, shall keep the said documents safe, uncancelled and undefaced, unless prevented from so doing by fire or other inevitable accident.


(4) The seller is entitled—

  • (a) to the rents and profits of the property till the ownership thereof passes to the buyer;

  • (b) where the ownership of the property has passed to the buyer before payment of the whole of the purchase-money, to a charge upon the property in the hands of the buyer, 1[any transferee without consideration or any transferee, with notice of the non-payment,] for the amount of the purchase-money, or any part thereof remaining unpaid, and for interest on such amount or part 1[from the date on which possession has been delivered].


(5) The buyer is bound—

  • (a) to disclose to the seller any fact as to the nature or extent of the seller’s interest in the property of which the buyer is aware, but of which he has reason to believe that the seller is not aware, and which materially increases the value of such interest;

  • (b) to pay or tender, at the time and place of completing the sale, the purchase-money to the seller or such person, as he directs: provided that, where the property is sold free from incumbrances, the buyer may retain out of the purchase-money the amount of any incumbrances on the property existing at the date of the sale, and shall pay the amount so retained to the persons entitled thereto;

  • c) where the ownership of the property has passed to the buyer, to bear any loss arising from the destruction, injury or decrease in value of the property not caused by the seller;

  • (d) where the ownership of the property has passed to the buyer, as between himself and the seller, to pay all public charges and rent which may become payable in respect of the property, the principal moneys due on any incumbrances subject to which the property is sold, and the interest thereon afterwards accruing due.


(6) The buyer is entitled—

  • (a) where the ownership of the property has passed to him, to the benefit of any improvement in, or increase in value of, the property, and to the rents and profits thereof;

  • (b) unless he has improperly declined to accept delivery of the property, to a charge on the property, as against the seller and all persons claiming under him 1*** to the extent of the seller's interest in the property, for the amount of any purchase-money properly paid by the buyer in anticipation of the delivery and for interest on such amount; and, when he properly declines to accept the delivery, also for the earnest (if any) and for the costs (if any) awarded to him of a suit to compel specific performance of the contract or to obtain a decree for its rescission.


An omission to make such disclosures as are mentioned in this section, paragraph (1), clause (a), and paragraph (5), clause (a), is fraudulent.

---------------------------------------------------------

AI Champdany Industries Ltd. vs. The Official Liquidator and Anr. - In terms of the aforementioned provisions, therefore, the seller is bound to pay all public charges due in respect of the property upto the date of sale, when a property is sold in auction. Section 55 refers to a contract only. Unless there is a contract to the contrary, the rights and obligations of the parties to a sale would be as indicated in Section 55. Such a contract to the contrary must be express and not implied, as a result whereof the meaning of term encumbrance would be expanded.

 SCI (2009.02.19) in AI Champdany Industries Ltd. vs. The Official Liquidator and Anr. [(2017) ibclaw.in 1204 SC, Civil Appeal No. 1118 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 15285 of 2008)] held that;

  • Encumbrance, therefore, must be capable of being found out either on inspection of the land or the office of Registrar or a statutory authority. A charge, burden or any other thing which impairs the use of the land or depreciates in its value may be a mortgage or a deed of trust or a lien or an easement. Encumbrance thus must be a charge on the property. It must run with the property. If by a reason of the statute no such burden on the title which diminishes the value of the land is created, it shall not constitute any encumbrance.

  • There cannot, thus, be any doubt or dispute that a provision of law must expressly provide for an enforcement of a charge against the property in the hands of the transferee for value without notice to the charge and not merely create a charge.

  • The real core of the saving provision of law must be not mere enforceability of the charge against the property charged but enforceability of the charge against the said property in the hands of a transferee for consideration without notice of the charge.

  • In terms of the aforementioned provisions, therefore, the seller is bound to pay all public charges due in respect of the property upto the date of sale, when a property is sold in auction. Section 55 refers to a contract only. Unless there is a contract to the contrary, the rights and obligations of the parties to a sale would be as indicated in Section 55. Such a contract to the contrary must be express and not implied, as a result whereof the meaning of term encumbrance would be expanded.

  • A debt which is secured or which by reason of the provisions of a statute becomes the first charge over the property having regard to the plain meaning of Article 372 of the Constitution of India must be held to prevail over the Crown debt which is an unsecured one. It is trite that when a Parliament or State Legislature makes an enactment, the same would prevail over the common law.


Excerpts of the order;

# 1. Leave granted.

# 2. Wool-Combers of India Limited (the company) went in liquidation. Appellant purchased assets of the company in liquidation in a court sale for a consolidated sum of Rs.7,03,00,000/-. Sale was confirmed by the learned Company Judge by an Order dated 15th September, 2006.


# 3. Appellant was served with a notice dated 15-02-2007 by Bhatpara Municipality claiming payment of arrears of property tax amounting to Rs.47,59,597.19/- for the period from 1991-1992 and 2006-2007, stating :

  • “that before adopting the said stringent measure for realizing the arrear property tax once again give you and opportunity to pay all arrear property tax in respect of the said holdings being 1/, West Ghoshpara Road, Ward No. 12, amounting to Rs.47,59,597.19/- plus statutory interest within seven days from the receipt thereof.”


# 4. Appellant contends that it has no liability to pay the said dues and the same has to be adjusted from the sale proceeds. It is furthermore stated that on and from the date of purchase it had paid all municipal rates and taxes subsequent to the date of sale.


Appellant on receipt of the said notice took out a Chamber Summons praying, inter alia, for the following reliefs :

  • “(a) Necessary clarification be made that Sale confirmed in favour of applicant by order dated 15th September, 2006 would make the applicant liable for payment of property tax only on and from the date of confirmation of sale i.e. 15th September, 2006 and not for any period prior thereto;

  • (b) Order dated 15th September, 2006 be suitably modified and/or clarified in terms of prayers above;

  • (c) Injunction restraining the respondent no. 2 from claiming any alleged arrear property tax for period prior to 15th September, 2006;

  • (d) Direction be given to the respondent no. 2 lodge its claim before the Official Liquidator for any alleged claim on account of property tax for period prior to 15th September, 2006.

  • (e) Injunction restraining the respondent no. 2 from giving any effect and/or further effect to the notice dated 15th February, 2007 and 6th March, 2007 being Annexures “E” and “G” respectively to the affidavit in support of this summons;

  • (f) Ad-interim orders in terms of prayers above; (g)Costs of and/or incidental to this application be paid by the respondent no. 2;

  • (h) Such further and/or other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.”


# 5. By reason of an order dated 7th February, 2008, the said application has been dismissed, stating :

  • “Having considered the submissions of the parties the terms “as is where is basis and whatever there is basis” signifies, the condition, quality and the quantity in which the assets sold, exists. It does not take into account the liabilities attached to the assets sold. The terms and conditions of sale, however, called upon the bidders to satisfy themselves regarding title and encumbrance attached to the said asset. Encumbrance would include the liability attached to the asset including the tax payable. Therefore, it was incumbent upon the purchaser to make enquiry regarding liabilities (to be read as encumbrance) attached to the asset before making the offer, The tax payable to the municipality is one such encumbrance and for not making enquiry the petitioner cannot avoid payment.”


# 6. An intra court appeal preferred thereagainst has been dismissed by a Division Bench of the said court.


# 7. Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned senior counsel, in support of this appeal, would contend that a purchaser is not liable to pay the property tax prior to the date of purchase and remedy of the respondent municipality, if any, was to have its claim satisfied from the sale proceeds in terms of Sections 529 and 529A of the Companies Act, 1956.


# 8. Mr. Sibaji Sen, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Municipal Corporation, on the other hand, would draw our attention to the advertisement for sale to contend that the appellant had a duty to make an enquiry in regard to the Company’s encumbrance as also in terms of the provisions of Sections 55(1) and 55(2)(g) of the Transfer of Property Act. 


The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the official liquidator would support the said contention.


# 9. The company went in liquidation. It was directed to be wound up. The official liquidator indisputably took charge of both movable and immovable assets of the company. The fact that the company went in liquidation was given due publicity. Respondent-Municipality did not file its claim before the official liquidator. It did not stand in queue to get the same recovered and/or adjusted from the sale proceeds.


Indisputably the manner in which the claim of a creditor in respect of the dues of the company in liquidation is to be realized has been laid down in Sections 529 and 529A of the Companies Act, 1956.


# 10. Dues in relation to the Municipal Tax in terms of the provisions of the said Act do not create any encumbrance on the property. It does not create any charge. It is considered to be a personal liability. On the aforementioned premise, we have to construe the terms and conditions of sale. It reads as under :

  • “1. The sale will be held as per inventory made by the Valuer on “As is Where is And Whatever There is” basis and subject to confirmation by the Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta. The Official Liquidator shall not provide any guarantee and/or warranty as to the quality, quantity or specification of the assets sold. The Offerers/Bidders are to satisfy themselves in this regard after physical inspection of the assets/properties as to the title, encumbrance, area, boundary, measurement, description etc. of the Company (in Liquidation) and the purchasers will be deemed to offer with full knowledge as to the defects, if any in the descriptions, quality or quantity of the assets sold. The Official Liquidator shall not entertain any complaint in this regard after the sale is over. Any mistake in the notice inviting tender shall not vitiate the sale.”


# 11. Both the learned Single Judge as also the Division Bench of the High Court held that having regard to the fact that an inventory was made on “as is where is and whatever there is” basis and furthermore in view of the fact that a duty was cast upon the offerer to satisfy themselves in regard to the physical inspection of the assets/properties as to the title, encumbrance, area, boundary, measurement, description etc. of the assets of the company in liquidation and the purchaser would be deemed to be offering his prices therefor with full knowledge as to the defects containing the descriptions, quality or quantity of the assets sold, the appellant was bound to make an investigation in regard to the liabilities of the company in liquidation.


# 12. The terms and conditions of the sale must be read as a whole. It must be given a purposive meaning. The word ‘encumbrance’ in relation to the word ‘immovable property’ carries a distinct meaning. It ordinarily cannot be assigned a general and/or dictionary meaning. We may however notice some dictionary meanings of the said word as reliance thereupon has been placed by Mr. Sibaji Sen.


In Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary of Words and Phrases 5th Edition Encumbrance is defined as “being, ‘a claim, lien, or liability, attached to property’; and this definition is wide enough to cover the plaintiff’s claim,” which was, as assignee for value of a reversionary interest, against a person coming in under a subsequent title.”


In Supreme Court on Words and Phrases it is stated that “the word ‘encumbrance’ means a burden or charge upon property or a claim or lien upon an estate or on the land.”


In Advanced Law Lexicon Encumbrance is defined as “an infringement of another’s right or intrusion on another’s property.”


In Black’s Law Dictionary Encumbrance is defined as “any right to, or interest in, land which may subsist in another to diminution of its value, but consistent with the passing of the fee.”


# 13. Encumbrance, therefore, must be capable of being found out either on inspection of the land or the office of Registrar or a statutory authority. A charge, burden or any other thing which impairs the use of the land or depreciates in its value may be a mortgage or a deed of trust or a lien or an easement. Encumbrance thus must be a charge on the property. It must run with the property. If by a reason of the statute no such burden on the title which diminishes the value of the land is created, it shall not constitute any encumbrance.


# 14. If the property tax was merely a statutory dues without creating any encumbrance on the property which had cast a duty upon all the auction purchasers to make an investigation, it would mean that he must try to find out all the liabilities of the company in liquidation in their entirety. Respondent-Municipality was an unsecured creditor. In that capacity it cannot stand on a higher footing than an ordinary unsecured creditor who is required to stand in queue with all others similarly situated for the purpose of realization of their dues from the sale proceeds.


# 15. Companies Act or any other law does not impose any additional obligation upon the purchaser to make an enquiry with regard to the liabilities of the companies other than those which would impede its value.


Reliance has been placed by Mr. Sen on a decision reported in Ahmedabad Municipality Vs. Haji Abdul [AIR 1971 SC 1201] wherein it was held :

  • “The plaintiff purchased the property in November, 1954 and in our opinion it could not have reasonably been expected by him that the receivers would not have paid to the municipal corporation, since 1949 the taxes and other dues which were charged on this property by statute. According to Section 61 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 the debts due to a local authority are given priority, being bracketed along with the debts due to the State.”


We may notice that Section 141 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act provides that the property taxes to be a first charge on the premise for which they are assessed. It is in that view of the matter Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act was found to be capable of being invoked therein, which reads as under :

  • “100. Charges – Where immoveable property of one person is by act of parties or operation of law made security for the payment of money to another, and the transaction does not amount to a mortgage, the latter person is said to have a charge on the property; and all the provisions hereinbefore contained which apply to a simple mortgage shall, so far as may be, apply to such charge.

  • Nothing in this section applies to the charge of a trustee on the trust-property for expenses properly incurred in the execution of his trust, and, save as otherwise expressly provided by any law for the time being in force, no charge shall be enforced against any property in the hands of a person to whom such property has been transferred for consideration and without notice of the charge.”


# 16. There cannot, thus, be any doubt or dispute that a provision of law must expressly provide for an enforcement of a charge against the property in the hands of the transferee for value without notice to the charge and not merely create a charge.


# 17. In Ahemdabad Municipality itself it was held :

  • “According to the submission it is not necessary for the saving provision to expressly provide for the enforceability of the charge against the property in the hands of a transferee for consideration without notice of the charge. This submission is unacceptable because, as already observed, what is enacted in the second half of Section 100 of Transfer of Property Act is the general prohibition that no charge shall be enforced against any property in the hands of a transferee for consideration without notice of the charge and the exception to this general rule must be expressly provided by law. The real core of the saving provision of law must be not mere enforceability of the charge against the property charged but enforceability of the charge against the said property in the hands of a transferee for consideration without notice of the charge. Section 141 of the Bombay Municipal Act is clearly not such a provision. The second contention accordingly fails and is repelled.”


It was further more held :

  • “Reliance was next placed on a Full Bench decision of the Allahabad High Court in Nawal Kishore V. The Municipal Board, Agra, ILR (1943). All 453 = (AIR 1943 All 115 (FB)). According to this decision the question of constructive notice is a question of fact which falls to be determined on the evidence and circumstances of each case. But that Court felt that there was a principle on which question of constructive notice could rest, that principle being that all intending purchasers of the property in municipal areas where the property is subject to a municipal tax which has been made a charge on the property by statute have a constructive knowledge of the tax and of the possibility of some arrears being due with the result that it becomes their duty before acquiring the property to make enquiries as to the amount of tax which is due or which may be due and if they fail to make this enquiry such failure amounts to a wilful abstention or gross negligence within the meaning of Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act and notice must be imputed to them.”


# 18. Clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act whereupon reliance has been placed by Mr. Sen reads as under :

  • “In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the buyer and the seller of immoveable property respectively are subject to the liabilities, and have the rights, mentioned in the rules next following, or such of them as are applicable to the property sold:-

  • (1) The seller is bound –

  • (g) to pay all public charges and rent accrued due in respect of the property up to the date of the sale, the interest on all encumbrances on such property due on such date, and, except where the property is sold subject to encumbrances, to discharge all encumbrances on the property then existing.”


# 19. In terms of the aforementioned provisions, therefore, the seller is bound to pay all public charges due in respect of the property upto the date of sale, when a property is sold in auction. Section 55 refers to a contract only. Unless there is a contract to the contrary, the rights and obligations of the parties to a sale would be as indicated in Section 55. Such a contract to the contrary must be express and not implied, as a result whereof the meaning of term encumbrance would be expanded.


The advertisement did not specify that all public charges have to be paid.


Municipal Corporation indisputably is not a preferential creditor. Companies Act in relation to winding up of proceeding is otherwise a special law. While distributing the assets between the creditors and unsecured creditors, the provisions of Sections 529 and 530 must be complied with.


# 20. All claims against the companies were required to be filed before the liquidator until the property was sold as provided for under Section 457 of the Companies Act. In terms of Section 456 thereof once an order for winding up is made the liquidator has to take into custody the properties, effects and actionable claims to which the company is or appears to be entitled. Section 528 provides that all debts payable on a contingency and all claims against the company, present or future are admissible to proof against the company. Section 529 provides for the same rule as in force for the time being under the law of insolvency with respect to the estates of persons adjudged insolvent. Section 530 provides for certain priorities to secured creditors and other unsecured creditors.


Once the property is sold, the assets of the company are required to be distributed to the creditors in order of preference. As the respondent- Municipality was not a secured creditor, the impugned Judgment cannot be sustained.


# 21. Almost a similar question in regard to the dues of the electrical charges came up for consideration before this Court in Isha Marbles Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and Anr.[(2017) ibclaw.in 1177 SC] : [1995 (2) SCC 648]. In that case sale of the assets of industrial undertaking took place in terms of the provisions of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Having regard to the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 a three Judge Bench of this Court held that a liability on the purchaser cannot be imposed which was not incurred by them stating :

  • “63. We are clearly of the opinion that there is great reason and justice in holding as above. Electricity is public property. Law, in its majesty, benignly protects public property and behoves everyone to respect public property. Hence, the courts must be zealous in this regard. But, the law, as it stands, is inadequate to enforce the liability of the previous contracting party against the auction-purchaser who is a third party and is in no way connected with the previous owner/occupier. It may not be correct to state, if we hold as we have done above, it would permit dishonest consumers transferring their units from one hand to another, from time to time, infinitum without the payment of the dues to the extent of lakhs and lakhs of rupees and each one of them can easily say that he is not liable for the liability of the predecessor in interest. No doubt, dishonest consumers cannot be allowed to play truant with the public property but inadequacy of the law can hardly be a substitute for overzealousness.”


# 22. Dues of the Municipality would also not even otherwise come within the purview of the crown debt. Even a crown debt could be discharged only after the secured creditors stand discharged.


# 23. In Union of India & Ors. Vs. Sicom Ltd. & Anr. [(2017) ibclaw.in 124 SC] : [2009 (1) SCALE 10], it is stated :

  • “11. Generally, the rights of the crown to recover the debt would prevail over the right of a subject. Crown debt means the debts due to the State or the king; debts which a prerogative entitles the Crown to claim priority for before all other creditors. [See Advanced Law Lexicon by P. Ramanatha Aiyear (3rd Edn.) p. 1147]. Such creditors, however, must be held to mean unsecured creditors. Principle of Crown debt as such pertains to the common law principle. A common law which is a law within the meaning of Article 13 of the Constitution is saved in terms of Article 372 thereof. Those principles of common law, thus, which were existing at the time of coming into force of the Constitution of India are saved by reason of the aforementioned provision. A debt which is secured or which by reason of the provisions of a statute becomes the first charge over the property having regard to the plain meaning of Article 372 of the Constitution of India must be held to prevail over the Crown debt which is an unsecured one. It is trite that when a Parliament or State Legislature makes an enactment, the same would prevail over the common law.

  • 12. Thus, the common law principle which was existing on the date of coming into force of the Constitution of India must yield to a statutory provision.

  • 13. To achieve the same purpose, the Parliament as also the State Legislatures inserted provisions in various statutes, some of which have been referred to hereinbefore providing that the statutory dues shall be the first charge over the properties of the tax-payer. This aspect of the matter has been considered by this Court in a series of judgments.”


# 24. For the reasons aforementioned, the impugned judgment cannot be sustained. It is set aside accordingly. The appeal is allowed with costs. Counsel’s fee assessed at Rs.10,000/-


---------------------------------------------------


Gaurav Jain Vs. Sanjay Gupta - Sale of CD as a Going Concern during Liquidation Process.

   NCLT Mumbai-I (09.03.2021) in Gaurav Jain  Vs. Sanjay Gupta, [IA No. 2264 of 2020 in C.P. (IB) No. 1239/MB/2018] held that; The crux of t...